Share

Watch It

On DVD: Now | On Blu-ray: Now

Quarantine Review

Movies.com Critics

4.5

Dave White Profile

...scary, jolt-filled and happily gross... Read full review

Other Critics provided by Metacritic.com

Critics scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more favorable reviews.

  • 3.0
    53

    out of 100

    Metascore®
    Mixed or average reviews
    based on a weighted average of all
    critic review scores.

  • 50

    out of 100

    Variety Joe Leydon

    A modestly inventive, sporadically exciting thriller that nonetheless proves too faithful to its central conceit for its own good.

    Read Full Review

  • 50

    out of 100

    Los Angeles Times

    Shame as well upon the advance marketing department for blowing the end of the movie in ads, thus exorcising any ghost of a chance Quarantine had of issuing a surprise.

    Read Full Review

  • 50

    out of 100

    ReelViews James Berardinelli

    It's easily the weakest entry into this ever-expanding category and is inferior to its subtitled source material. Quarantine implies "stay away" and that's not bad advice.

    Read Full Review

  • 50

    out of 100

    The Hollywood Reporter Frank Scheck

    Oh, "Blair Witch," what hath thou wrought? It has taken less than a decade, but the concept of horror films filmed documentary-style has officially become a tiresome cliche.

    Read Full Review

  • 60

    out of 100

    The New York Times Jeannette Catsoulis

    The template is familiar, but Quarantine delivers the heebie-jeebies with solid acting and perfectly calibrated shocks.

    Read Full Review

  • 83

    out of 100

    Entertainment Weekly

    Quarantine director John Erick Dowdle and co-writing brother Drew wisely stick close to the told-from-the-cameraman's point-of-view template of the terrific original, though they add a few fine flourishes.

    Read Full Review

  • See all Quarantine reviews at Metacritic.com

For Families provided by Common Sense Media

not for kids

Grim, grisly horror film only for mature viewers.

What Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that this horror movie is absolutely terrifying, full of gore and terror and violence. Grisly wounds are shown in great detail, and tension builds to a fever pitch. The victims -- hungry, angry, mindless zombie-like creatures -- are the stuff that nightmares are made of. Parents should also know that the film's style -- all of the action is seen through the lens of a single news camera as it follows a group of firefighters on a "routine" call -- makes for an upsetting, frenetic, and intense viewing experience. There's also some swearing and sexual innuendo.

  • Families can talk about why zombie-style films are so popular. What anxieties do they speak to?
  • How have modern "zombie" movies changed from the original examples of the genre?
  • Also, do you think the movie's single-camera technique makes the filmmore frightening, or is it a gimmick designed to cover up a weak,familiar plot?
  • Families can also discuss the film's scenario -- what law enforcementand medical procedures are in place in the event of a biologicalemergency? Would they be effective?

The good stuff
  • message true0

    Messages: Extensive depiction of extreme circumstances of horror as the dwindling survivors in a quarantined apartment building are attacked by the victims of the virus; the outside world not only fails to offer help but actively shoots and attacks any of the people desperately trying to get out. Mention of "doomsday cults" and "nuclear, biological, and chemical" attacks.

  • rolemodels true0

    Role models: A mixed bag; the heroes are good role models, but most of the others are not.

What to watch for
  • violence false5

    Violence: Near-constant, unrelenting horror violence, gore, and tension. The victims of a genetically engineered virus become aggressive, biting and attacking anyone in their path; there are also shootings, fatal falls, bludgeoning, and beatings. The film's central conceit that all the action is being filmed by a news crew leads to a scene in which an infected berserker is literally beaten to death with the camera. Animals are seen attacking humans; animals are seen eviscerated. Wounds and injuries are depicted with grim realism.

  • sex false3

    Sex: Some sexual innuendo and implied off-screen nudity; a firefighter bets he can "bang" a reporter before the end of the night.

  • language false4

    Language: Relatively infrequent strong language includes "damn," "s--t," "f--k," and more.

  • consumerism false0

    Consumerism: Not an issue

  • drugsalcoholtobacco false2

    Drinking, drugs and smoking: A character is clearly drunk; another character offers his Vicodin stash to help a veterinarian try to aid injured characters.

Fan Reviews provided by

4

by Ronin Bahamut

2

it sucked by DJM238
She kept screaming in the dark making it easier for the infected to find her, man I was glad when they finally got to her, because she wouldn't shut up. If she would shut up, the people she known would've survived, because all she had to do was to stay quiet.

5

Super Scary Man!!! by currydpizza
Okay, first of all, all the people who said the acting was bad are dupid. The only part really to complain about was the first scenes where the acting was questionable. Then the rest i thought was amazing. It was honestly one of, if not the most scariest movie ive seen.

3

by ChrisInPit

2

by geoelevation25

4

by A_Shred

3

by portatoface

Advertisement