Share

Watch It

On DVD: Now | On Blu-ray: Now

Pathfinder Review

Movies.com Critics

2.0

Dave White Profile

… some decent impalings … Read full review

Other Critics provided by Metacritic.com

Critics scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more favorable reviews.

  • 2.0
    29

    out of 100

    Metascore®
    Generally unfavorable reviews
    based on a weighted average of all
    critic review scores.

  • 20

    out of 100

    The New York Times Manohla Dargis

    The director, Marcus Nispel, takes his butchery very seriously. (He was the lead vivisectionist for the remake of "The Texas Chain Saw Massacre.") He may not be able to make this movie move, but, man, can he make an eyeball fly.

    Read Full Review

  • 30

    out of 100

    Los Angeles Times

    One of the funniest films of the year. That's not good news for this attempted action-adventure, which clearly lost its way in its own copious fog.

    Read Full Review

  • 38

    out of 100

    USA Today Claudia Puig

    All cinematic creativity seems to have focused on devising the most repellent ways to maim and murder.

    Read Full Review

  • 40

    out of 100

    Variety

    Like "300" and "Apocalypto," this latest bit of historical balder-dash stands in direct defiance of proven action-movie formulas, trusting its brutal concept and striking visuals to overcome a lack of star power.

    Read Full Review

  • 42

    out of 100

    Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

    Pathfinder's moody, muddy look is courtesy of music-video director Marcus Nispel, who doesn't distinguish between people and tree trunks when it comes to emotional content.

    Read Full Review

  • 70

    out of 100

    The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt

    Nicely balances action and adventure with American Indian wisdom and a modest romance to provide a graphic-comic-book movie experience for males in urban markets.

    Read Full Review

  • See all Pathfinder reviews at Metacritic.com

For Families provided by Common Sense Media

Iffy for 15+

Bloody actioner pits Vikings vs. Native Americans.

What Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that this period action film earns its R rating with frequent scenes of hard-hitting, bloody violence. Weapons including swords, rocks, arrows, spears, spiky traps, chains, maces, and axes are used to decapitate, dismember, hang, beat, impale, stab, and crush victims (broken, rotting bodies are shown). Others die via drowning, avalanche, bear attack, falls, and more. Images of the mayhem range from aggressively chaotic to slow-motion poetic, with repeated shots of spurting blood (primarily from chests and necks). Most of the characters are bent on vengeance; the Vikings plan to exterminate the Native Americans (whom they call "savages") and are depicted as tall, dark monsters who tend to roar more than speak. When they do talk, they use a couple of mild swear words (in subtitles), including "bitch" and "damn."

  • Families can talk about the role of violence in the movie. Is it appropriate for the story that's being told? Which parts, if any, are gratuitous? How accurate do you think it is? Families can also discuss the enduring mythology of the white hero. How is it significant that Ghost is white instead of Native American? How does he struggle with his double heritage? What does he learn about vengeance?

The good stuff
  • message true0

    Messages: The Vikings are all-around grisly and evil; most of the Native Americans are stereotypical presented as being nobly in tune with the land. The protagonist is caught between both groups and is vengeful until he's killed all his enemies.

What to watch for
  • violence false5

    Violence: Violence is alternately represented in lyrical and hard-hitting imagery. A child is discovered in a wrecked Viking ship among corpses; battle scenes include spearing, decapitation, arrows, knives, swords, trampling, falling, an arm getting lopped off, throats being cut, a bear attack, impaling, beating, kicking, hanging (bodies displayed after death), drowning, and crushing by an avalanche. Frequent shots of blood spurting. Vikings throw woman against a log as if to rape her, but the hero steps in.

  • sex false0

    Sex: Man and woman lie close to each other, apparently nude (they're trying to keep warm, but they're also the designated romantic couple).

  • language false0

    Language: Just a few curse words used by Vikings (in subtitles): "damn" and "bitch."

  • consumerism false0

    Consumerism: Not an issue

  • drugsalcoholtobacco false0

    Drinking, drugs and smoking: Brief use of medicinal herbs/smoke during a a healing ritual.

Fan Reviews provided by

3

This one died by the sword by sethrich
The trailers for Pathfinder appeared promising and led me to believe it could be just as good as the also recent historical action movie, 300. Sadly, this movie is a disappointment. It had potential and could have been a lot better if a few things were different. The action/fight scenes are the best things going for Pathfinder, and they're fairly decent, but they're not good enough to carry the movie on their back. The wilderness landscapes are also appealing to the eye, but the lack of good dialogue and the presence of a predictable story (and hero) contribute to the downfall of this disappointment.

2

Don't waste your time. by ak2099
I felt that my time would have been better spent sleeping. Definitely not worth the $7.50 early show. Decent fighting scenes could not make up for lack of plot and near zero dialogdialog

3

Pathfinder gets lost! by twillebn
The best part of this movie is the costumes....weak story. When you see the previews.....that's the best part. My 13 year old son fell asleep if that tells you anything. In fact, we almost walked out early. Oh well.

1

This movie was top five by michael.bailey-02
This movie was top five worst movies ever made! The plot line was mentally retarded, the action was worse than a crappy power rangers knock off, and there was holes in the story constantly. Everyone i went with fell asleep. You should have paid me to see this huge steaming pile of cinematic crap. If you like this movie, i hope it is the first movie you have ever seen, because if you like this movie, i hate you. If this movie was a group of people, it would be the scum of the earth. if you liked 300 or conan or any other good movie about warriors fighting, please don't waste your money on this hunk of baby crap with burnt hair in it. Just go to 300 again! If this movie was a smell it would smell like big foots ****.

3

Pathfinder by dizzymiss_lizzy
I thought it was an ok movie. It was not worth the $9/ticket I paid, but it's worth seeing at the dollar movies or renting. The plot was kind of fun, but the dialogue was horrendously cheesy at times. There isn't much talking in it, which at first kind of bugged me, but as the lines that were said got worse and worse, I became more grateful for the silent scenes. Cinematography was excellent, with some GORGEOUS locations. A few holes in the plot/action, but otherwise not a bad movie. I was entertained.

1

Horrible by jonm80
The movie was horrible. My brother and I ended up walking out about 3/4 of the way through. You kept waiting for the acting to get better and for someone to call someone by a name. The cut scenes were horrible and choppy. The dramatic incidents were corny at best and stolen from other movies. Save your ten dollars, Don't even spend the money to rent this one and don't take up a slot on your netflix.

3

by TonyT97

Advertisement